Modern.gov Breadcrumb
- Decision details
Modern.gov Content
Decision details
To override rights to light relating to land at Cattle Market Road and part of Temple Island, Bristol
Decision Maker: Executive Director: Growth and Regeneration
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: No
Is subject to call in?: No
Purpose:
To override the rights to light over the land
at Cattle Market Road and part of Temple Island, Bristol pursuant
to Section 203 of the Housing and Planning Act 2016.
Decision:
The disposal of the Cattle Market Road site
and part of the Temple Island site was approved by Cabinet in
September 2017. The land sale agreement required the City Council
to seek approval to exercise its powers of appropriation in respect
of rights to light in relation to the Cattle Market Road property
and part of Temple Island if it was not able to demonstrate that it
acquired the property for development/planning purposes.
A right to light analysis report has been undertaken on behalf of
the University of Bristol which demonstrates that no interference
of rights to light exist, and that all of the neighbouring
properties should continue to enjoy reasonable levels of light or
be no worse off than they are presently.
Decision taken:
1.To confirm and evidence the Council’s purpose of the
acquisition of the site in 2015 for development/planning
purposes.
2.To confirm the intention of the Council to rely on Section 203 of
the Housing and Planning Act 2016 to override the rights of light
over land at Cattle Market Road and part of Temple Island, Bristol
.
In doing so, the Council has considered the provisions of the
Equalities Act 2010 and the Human Rights Act 1998 so far as they
might be applicable in deciding whether or not to confirm the
intention to override the rights of light. With regard to Article 1
of Protocol 1 Part II of Schedule I of the Human Rights Act 1998,
it is considered that in balancing the rights of the individual who
may be affected by the overriding against the benefit to the
community of proceeding with the overriding, the overriding
resulting in the interference of individual rights is justified in
the interests of regenerating the area.
Alternative options considered:
Option 1 - The Council could have elected not
to utilise the powers available to it in order to override any
rights of light however this would be contravention of the terms of
the land sale agreement with the University of Bristol and may also
have resulted in additional delays and costs to this important
regeneration project.
Option 2 -
Option 3 -
Publication date: 18/11/2019
Date of decision: 11/11/2019