Issue - meetings

Any member of the public or councillor may participate in public forum.  The detailed arrangements for so doing are set out in the public information sheet at the back of this agenda.  Public forum items should be emailed to democratic.services@bristol.gov.uk   - please note that the following deadlines will apply in relation to this meeting:-

Questions - written questions must be received at least 3 clear working days prior to the meeting.  For this meeting, this means that your question(s) must be received in this office at the latest by 5.00 pm on Wednesday 22 June 2016.

Petitions and written statements - petitions and written statements must be received on the working day prior to the meeting.  For this meeting, this means that your submission must be received in this office at the latest by 12.00 noon on Monday 27 June 2016.

None received.

Any member of the public or councillor may participate in public forum.  The detailed arrangements for so doing are set out in the public information sheet at the back of this agenda.  Public forum items should be emailed to democratic.services@bristol.gov.uk   - please note that the following deadlines will apply in relation to this meeting:-

Questions - written questions must be received at least 3 clear working days prior to the meeting.  For this meeting, this means that your question(s) must be received in this office at the latest by 5.00 pm on Tuesday 14 June 2016.

Petitions and written statements - petitions and written statements must be received on the working day prior to the meeting.  For this meeting, this means that your submission must be received in this office at the latest by 12.00 noon on Friday 17 June 2016.

The partnership received public forum statements, presented by Keith Way as follows.

The Chair agreed take Statement 1 with item 11.

In discussion the following points were noted:

a.     With reference to Statement 2. The Neighbourhood Coordinator advised that St George Neighbourhood Partnership had used Narrow Estate Funding to employ a fund raiser. The fund raiser had been given a set of target projects to fund raise for.  The Neighbourhood Team were considering the most appropriate model that could see this pilot rolled out across all neighbourhood partnerships areas, and prevent the possibility of duplication of effort with Partnerships going after the same funding streams.

b.     One model might include teaming up with other neighbourhood partnerships in the South Bristol area.

The Neighbourhood partnership AGREED that a more detailed proposal be brought to the next meeting and that the potential for working with other neighbourhood partnerships to employ a fund raiser be explored.

Action: Emily Smith