Modern.gov Breadcrumb
- Agenda and draft minutes
Modern.gov Content
Agenda and draft minutes
- Attendance details
- Agenda frontsheet PDF 183 KB
- Agenda reports pack
- Arena Value for Money study outcomes - additional documents PDF 4 MB
- Updated public forum notice PDF 150 KB
- KPMG report - Temple Island Arena VFM assessment - Background document - redacted PDF 6 MB
- Printed draft decisions made / draft minutes PDF 234 KB
Venue: Council Chamber, City Hall
Contact: Andrea Dell
Link: Watch Live Webcast
No. | Item |
---|---|
Welcome, introductions and safety information PDF 126 KB Members of the public intending to attend the meeting are asked to please note that, in the interests of health, safety and security, bags may be searched on entry to the building. Everyone attending this meeting is also asked please to behave with due courtesy and to conduct themselves in a reasonable way.
Please note: if the alarm sounds during the meeting, everyone should please exit the building via the way they came in, via the main entrance lobby area, and then the front ramp. Please then assemble on the paved area between the side entrance of the cathedral and the roundabout at the Deanery Road end of the building.
If the front entrance cannot be used, alternative exits are available via staircases 2 and 3 to the left and right of the Council Chamber. These exit to the rear of the building. The lifts are not to be used. Then please make your way to the assembly point at the front of the building. Please do not return to the building until instructed to do so by the fire warden(s).
Minutes: The Chair welcomed all attendees to the meeting, and made a safety announcement in relation to the fire/emergency evacuation procedure.
|
|
Apologies for absence Minutes: None received
|
|
Declarations of interest To note any declarations of interest from councillors. They are asked to indicate the relevant agenda item, the nature of the interest and in particular whether it is a disclosable pecuniary interest.
Any declaration of interest made at the meeting which is not on the register of interests should be notified to the Monitoring Officer for inclusion.
Minutes: None received
|
|
As this is an extraordinary meeting of the Board, public forum business must relate specifically to the business for which this extraordinary meeting has been arranged.
Any member of the public or councillor may participate in public forum. Public forum items should be emailed to democratic.services@bristol.gov.uk
Please note that the following deadlines will apply in relation to this meeting:
Questions - Written questions must be submitted by 12.00 noon on Thursday 14 June 2018 at latest.
Petitions and statements - Petitions / written statements must be submitted by 12.00 noon on Friday 15 June 2018 at latest. Minutes:
|
|
Arena Value for Money study outcomes PDF 204 KB The Board is asked to:
1. Review the contents of all the Value for Money reports.
2. Produce a report for Cabinet outlining OSM Board members’ observations on the Value for Money reports, to contribute to future decision making. Additional documents:
Minutes: An overview of each session is set out below, including a summary of key points at the conclusion of each session which OSM Board members agreed should be considered in formulating their report to Cabinet.
All 3 sessions were webcast and the discussion can be accessed in full from this link:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UChYwQT6nK-mPU3K8bYsZ17g Due to the extensive detail that needed to be considered, the OSM Board’s scrutiny of these reports took place over 3 structured sessions:
At this second session, the Board focused on:
At this third session, the Board focused on:
6.1 KEY CONCLUSIONS AND COMMENTS TO CABINET AS SUMMARISED BY THE CHAIR, COUNCILLOR GOLLOP
There appears to be a fair degree of consensus amongst members and across parties. We see that the proposed Arena at Temple Meads is a fully developed project that is ready to start, and that the alternative proposal is very much at its early stages. We see that KPMG indicate that the potential benefits are greater from the alternative site and alternative use for Arena Island, but KPMG also state that the risks attached to the alternative projects have not been quantified and that has to be considered by the Mayor in making his decision. We sense that officers favour the Filton proposal. Whilst we understand that in that scenario YTL take the project risk, Members also see that they are the main beneficiary of the significant infrastructure investment. It is the considered view of OSM members that;
|