Agenda and minutes

Bristol Schools Forum - Tuesday, 24th November, 2020 5.00 pm

Venue: Virtual Meeting - Zoom Committee Meeting with Public Access via YouTube. View directions

Contact: Corrina Haskins 

Link: Watch Live Webcast

Items
Note No. Item

A

1.

Welcome

Presented By: Chair

Minutes:

The Chair welcomed everyone to the meeting.

A

2.

Forum Standing Business

(a)  Apologies for Absence

(b)  Confirmation meeting is quorate

(c)  Appointment of new members/Resignations: 

Rob Endley (NASUWT) replacing William Brown (NEU) as School Union Representatives

(d)  Notification of Vacancies:

·         Two Primary Academy Heads;

·         Two Primary Maintained Heads;

·         Two Primary Academy Governors;

·         Two Secondary Academy Heads;

·         One Secondary Academy Governor;

(e)  Declarations of Interest

 

Presented By: Clerk

Minutes:

  1. Apologies for absence

Apologies for absence were received from:

Trish Dodds - Academy Primary Governor Rep, Fishponds Academy,

Councillor Anna Keen - Bristol City Council Cabinet Member – Education and Skills

 

  1. Quorate

The Clerk confirmed the meeting was quorate.

 

  1. Resignations

 

There were no resignations to report.

 

  1. Appointment of New Members

 

The Clerk advised of the following new members:

Rob Endley – Trade Union Representative

Melanie Bunce – Maintained Primary Head Representative, St Barnabas

 

  1. Notification of Vacancies

The Clerk advised of the following Schools Forum Vacancies:

·         One Primary Academy Head

·         Two Primary Maintained Heads

·         Two Primary Academy Governors

·         Two Secondary Academy Heads

·         One Secondary Academy Governor

 

  1. Declarations of Interest

There were no declarations of interest.

 

3.

Chair's Update

Minutes:

The Chair asked Members to undertake the Department for Education produced Schools Forum self-evaluation in order to produce useful feedback on how the Forum could improve.  She asked Members to complete the evaluation by the end of the calendar year.

 

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/888263/Schools_forum_self-assessment_checklist.pdf

 

A

4.

Minutes of the Previous Meeting pdf icon PDF 113 KB

(a)  To confirm as a correct record

(b)  Matters arising not covered on agenda

Presented By: Chair

Minutes:

RESOLVED - that the minutes be confirmed as a correct record.

 

I

5.

Verbal Update from Director: Education and Skills

Presented By: AH

Minutes:

AH gave a verbal update as follows:

 

  • Acknowledged the ongoing challenges faced by schools as a result of the Covid pandemic and thanked representatives for attending the meeting;
  • Confirmed that, although some time had been diverted to Covid related work, the key priorities of the education transformation programme were still being met;
  • SEND system transformation update:
    • The LA was continuing to respond to the Written Statement of Action;
    • There had been a virtual monitoring visit during November from DfE and NHS England;
    • There had been 89% completion/near completion against the 66 milestones and a summary would be made public in the local offer as well as being sent to Heads through the bulletin and there would also be a full milestone update to Schools Forum in January;
    • Although 89% compliant, the key area of where milestones had not been met was the strategy to develop additional specialist provision.  This strategy, to expand and repurpose space within existing specialist and mainstream schools, was launched in February and 78 expressions of interest were received.  However, a setback had occurred during the first lockdown as onsite feasibility studies could not be completed.  Although some of the work had since been carried out, further challenges caused by Covid meant that work would be delayed until the spring term. 
  • Alternative Learning Provision Review: was coming to an end and there would be a report back on the outcome of the review.  AH thanked everyone who engaged in the process. 
  • Y7 sufficiency in East Central: DfE had been unable to progress with opening of the school in Temple Quarter due to delays in securing planning permission.  The Council was now working closely with Cabot Learning Federation to identify additional space and capacity and there was a report going to Cabinet in December to look at relocating Sixth Form students in a single site to free up additional space. 

 

AH responded to questions as follows:

  • In relation to the sufficiency places, once space in existing schools had been created, the additional 140 students would remain there for the rest of their secondary school education;
  • Alternative Provision in mainstream schools would be funded through a service level agreement;
  • The relocation of Sixth Form students would this take place from September 2021. 

 

RESOLVED that the verbal update be noted.

 

Di

6.

Dedicated School Grant (DSG) Budget Monitor 2020-21 (Period 7) pdf icon PDF 228 KB

Presented By: GB

Minutes:

GB introduced the report and drew attention to the following:

·         Period 7 was the period up until the end of October;

·         Since the previous period, there had been change in relation to the High Needs Block with the in-year overspend now being forecast as £8m;

·         The overspend had largely been associated with top ups due to an increase in both numbers and costs and further details were outlined in appendix 2;

·         In special schools there were over 100 more pupils receiving top ups and 400 more in mainstream schools with more pupils in the higher bands.  Also Sixth Form colleges had a significant increase in the last couple of years at the cost of an extra £1m per year to the High Needs Block.

 

AH confirmed that:

·         the Education Transformation Programme was designed to improve the SEND system rather than cut costs;

·         the increase in number of EHCPs being processed had therefore led to an increase in costs;

·         there was also a national trend for an increase in requests for ECHPs;

·         in the longer term the financial position would be more stable as the right provision was in place. 

 

In response to a question about what the Local Authority was planning to do to reduce the deficit in the High Needs Block and why the level of deficit was not identified earlier, the following points were made:

·         the position was not sustainable and the LA were looking at a number of options, including lobbying for additional government funding as this was a national problem where the level of funding did not meet the increase in demand for SEND provision;

·         The work of Transformation Programme would address the sustainability of the High Needs Block e.g. the LA was investing capital funding into increasing places in the right settings;

·         The DfE had issued a deficit management plan for Local Authorities which was a useful tool would be used in conjunction with the longer term business plan;

·         The information on how Bristol City Council spent its capital allocation was not the remit of the Schools Forum, but this information could be shared at future meetings;

·         Although the increasing deficit had been predicted for a while, a lot of work had needed to be undertaken from a data perspective to give the full picture.

 

The following responses were given in response to questions raised by Forum Members:

·         The increase in deficit was partly due to clearing the backlog of ECHP applications, 639 had been processed so far in the current year compared to 410 for the whole of the previous year;

·         It was also acknowledged that schools were not able to meet SEND needs from their budgets and there was a big piece of work linked to ordinarily available provision in schools and part of that was setting a strong foundation that was equitable and consistent across schools; the “belonging strategy” - a wider strategy to make sure SEND students could attend school and have their needs met; the workforce development programme to meet  ...  view the full minutes text for item 6.

De

7.

Schools Block School Funding Formula 2021/22 pdf icon PDF 197 KB

Presented By: GB/TY

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Chair asked members for a steer for the Schools Block/funding formula for 2021/22 in advance of final decisions being taken at the Forum meeting in January.

 

GB outlined the following:

·         The final DfE allocations would be available in January and the data in the report and appendices was provisional based on October 2019 data;

·         The rules were largely similar to previous years with a few minor amendments;

·         There was still a wish to move to a hard national funding formula, but for 2021/22 there was still discretion for a local funding formula;

·         There had been a change to the basis for assigning IDACI bands;

·         The teachers’ pay and pension grants had been subsumed into the DSG and tweaks had been made to ensure schools would get an additional amount per pupil;

·         The view of Forum was sought on a block transfer to High Needs of 0.5%;

·         The Minimum Funding Guarantee could be set between +0.5% and 2% and last year an MFG of 0.5% had been agreed;

·         A proposed block transfer of 0.5% was proposed to the High Needs Block to fund education transformation work;

·         It was proposed to keep the lump sum at £125k;

·         Members were asked to support a disapplication for Avanti Gardens.  Avanti Gardens used to be an all through school (Steiner School) and was now primary only and so without the disapplication the school would be protected at a higher level rather than being based only on primary factors;

·         There had been a consultation with schools in the beginning of November and a summary of the responses was included in Appendix B;

·         There was no proposal to re-establish the falling rolls fund as very few schools would be eligible.

 

In response to a question about how the schools block subtotal of £280m for 2021/22 compared with the 2020/21 allocation and the overall percentage increase, members were advised that it was difficult to compare, but taking off the £2m allocated for the Growth Fund, the block had increased by 3.1%.

 

In response to a question about whether some of the gains that schools may get for additional funding may be lost from IDACI re-bandings, it was confirmed that the rebasing would result in less money being given out through the formula but the minimum funding guarantee was still positive and so schools would not lose out.

 

It was clarified that the extra capacity planned for Year 7 in East Bristol was not included in the growth fund table as this was a future proposal rather than a known commitment.

 

RESOLVED that:

(1)   the changes in the formula methodology for 2021/22 be noted;

(2)   the following proposed arrangements for the 2021/22 mainstream funding formula be AGREED subject to a final decision in January 2021:

a. transfer 0.5% to High Needs Block;

b. set MFG at 0.5%;

c. retain lump sum at current level (£125k);

d. allocate any spare funding (after mandated items) to AEN;

e. allocate £2m to Growth Fund;

(3)   the  ...  view the full minutes text for item 7.

De

8.

De-delegation pdf icon PDF 64 KB

Presented By: GB/TY

Minutes:

On behalf of the Maintained Primary School representatives, CP reported that it had been agreed to continue with the Employee and Premises Insurance until the end of the contract, but requested that the LA look at Risk Protection Arrangements in school in the future.  It had also been agreed that although the representatives supported the de delegation of Trade Union facility time, the contribution be paused in the current year in order to use up the reserves.

 

Rob Endley made a statement on behalf of the joint teaching unions in support of de–delegation of Trades Union facility time. 

 

(1)   Forum noted the outcomes of the consultation on school funding arrangements;

(2)   Maintained primary school representatives of Schools Forum voted on the de-delegation of the following services at the amounts per pupil indicated for 2021-22:

a) Employee and Premises Insurance £31.06 AGREED

b) Assessment of eligibility for free school meals £1.14 AGREED

c) Maternity supply cover £31.17 AGREED

d) Schools in financial difficulty AGREED to de delegate but carry forward from previous year

e) Trades Union facility time AGREED to de delegate but carry forward from previous year

f) Education psychology NOT AGREED

 

(3)   Maintained secondary school representatives AGREED the de-delegation of the following services at the amounts per pupil indicated for 2021-22:

a) Employee and Premises Insurance £39.38;

b) Assessment of eligibility for free school meals £1.14;

c) Maternity supply cover £45.27 ;

d) Trades Union facility time £3.85;

e) Health and safety roving reps £0.91;

f) Education psychology £5.63.       

 

I

9.

Trading with Schools Annual Report pdf icon PDF 6 MB

Presented By: AM

Additional documents:

Minutes:

AM introduced the Trading with Schools (TwS) Annual report and drew attention to the following:

·         The Annual Report was an opportunity to focus on the quality and quantity of work carried out by the TwS;

·         As manager, AM was proud of the achievements, it had been a challenging year as there had been a significant change before Covid when TwS was moved to the Commercialisation Team followed by the rapid transformation of ways of working as a result of the Covid pandemic;

·         A number of services were moved out of TwS but a single point of contact was retained for the benefit of customers;

·         What went well: customer retention remained high and TwS was the provider of choice for many educational settings;

·         TwS continued to work towards BCC priorities;

·         TwS was preparing 21-22 services and organising a virtual event for annual orders;

·         TwS had recently been transferred back to Education and Skills under the management of AH;

·         AM thanked all colleagues for their continued support.   

 

RESOLVED that the Trading with Schools Annual Report be noted.