Modern.gov Breadcrumb

Modern.gov Content

Issue - meetings

Report for decision

Meeting: 08/10/2019 - Area Committee 6 (Item 13)

13 Report on proposed decisions for councillors pdf icon PDF 1 MB

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Committee first considered progress updates on the CIL and S106 funded projects approved at the 2018 Area Committee meeting as follows:

 

Project approved 2018

Project descriptions

Funding agreed

Delivery period

 

 

 

19/20 financial year

20/21 financial year

21/22 financial year

Parks

 

Crox Bottom Signage and Interpretation Project

Signage and Interpretation Project

£8,000 

 

 

 

Cottle Road Play Park

Improvements to Cottle Road Play Park

£40,000

 

 

 

King’s Head Park Improvement Project

Improvement Project

£25,850

 

 

 

Filwood Play: Inns Court & Novers

seating & park improvements

£20,000

 

 

 

Transport

 

Hengrove Lane

traffic calming

£50,000

 

 

 

Community

 

 

 

Wilmott Park

Support to create BMX Track

£35,000

 

 

 

Filwood Broadway

Street scene improvements

£10,000

Completed

 

 

Christ Church Hall

Upgrade

£7,000

Nov 2019

 

 

Trees

 

Uplands Tree replacement

Tree replacement

£2,065

Completed

 

Councillors expressed their frustration that the projects approved had not been completed or had taken longer than they expected.

 

With reference to Parks projects, funding had been agreed however none of the four projects had been completed.  Officers apologised for the delay which was largely an issue of resources.  Increased resource had been allocated to the Delivery Team however, their team did not have a full complement of staff.  An email would be sent to Councillors once a delivery schedule had been established. (ACTION: Richard Fletcher)

 

Councillor Morris made the Councillors aware that of the money allocated to each project (for CIL allocations) there would likely be a 20% reduction once costs for management and a contingency fund had been deducted.  For example, the Cottle Road Play Park award of £40,000 amounted to £32,000 following deductions.  

It was noted that section 106 allocations did not require extra funds for delivery.

 

There was concern that Members of the public considered quotes obtained through Council procedures higher than those acquired by the community.  Members of the public were aware how much equipment costs and were frustrated that they could not affect change themselves.  Officers confirmed that two or three quotes were sought and often the cheapest would be awarded the contract.  Suppliers needed to be on the Council’s approved list and due consideration needed to be given to insurance and maintenance.

 

With reference to transport items, Councillor Clough asked for an update on the dropped kerbs in her ward that had been allocated funds three years prior.  It was agreed that Councillor Clough would seek further information from officers regarding where the funds currently sat. (ACTION: Mark Sperduty)

 

Councillor Morris was concerned that S106 projects that were time sensitive could lose their money allocated due to the delay in delivery.  Mowberry Road was highlighted as an allocation of £30,000 and officers were asked to update Councillor Morris with progress (ACTION: Mark Sperduty)

 

With reference to all types of projects, it was agreed that Communications from officers could be improved, including information about which officer was leading the projects and its current status.  Councillors were often the middle person between the community and the Council and needed the right information in order to communicate effectively.  Officers agreed to send updated information to Members asap (ACTION: Mark  ...  view the full minutes text for item 13


Meeting: 13/09/2018 - Area Committee 5 (Item 6)

6 Report on proposed decisions for councillors pdf icon PDF 254 KB

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Committee received a report on proposed decisions for the awarding of local CIL and S106. Those parts of an Area Committee which had a formally adopted Neighbourhood Development Plan to receive 25% of the CIL generated within the defined border of their Plan, to support their identified infrastructure priorities. It was noted that otherwise 15% of CIL generated within each Area Committee area was available for spend.

                                                          

Resolved – as set out below and in the report -

 

1.     The projects invited to submit Stage 2 full Proposals and those not invited or not able to proceed (Item 3) were noted and decisions made as set out in the table below;

2.     The CIL and S106 monies available at 31st July 2018 and the option of pre-committing future CIL receipts to support the proposals in the paper (Item 4) be noted:

·       CIL: £170,866.36

·       S106: £369,948.04

3.     The Proposals as submitted for consideration in the report, including any conditions and allocation of eligible S106 monies to support relevant proposals, in order to conserve CIL funds for future use (Item 5), be approved subject to completion of an EqIA and other conditions as indicated in the table below;

4.     That the use of the former Megabowl Site, Brunel Way, Ashton S106 as clarified in the report, to avoid the ambiguity and potential limitation of the recorded decision of the 12th February 2018 Neighbourhood Committee meeting (Item 6), be approved:

Recommendation: - That the sum of £30,000 of Parks Section 106 funding received from the former Megabowl Site, Brunel Way, Ashton is applied in the following order:

1.         The provision of new and improved children’s play facilities in Greville Smyth Park;

2.         Should the new and improved children’s play facilities in Greville Smyth Park cost less than £30,000, the remainder of the funding is to be applied to children’s play facilities in parks within a one mile radius of the former Megabowl site;

 

5.     That priorities not coming for decision at this meeting (Item 7) be put forward by the local ward Councillor(s)/communities for future Area Committee to approve as they agree in conversation with their communities;

6.      The Review being set up to consider the 2018 CIL/S106 process and inform 2019 process (Item8) be noted;

7.     The legal information concerning the Public Sector Equality duty in reaching all its decisions (Item 9) be noted.

 

Stage 2 Full Proposals

 

No.

Project Name

Delivery Group

Outline £ requested/

offered

Full Proposal £ requested

CIL req’d

S106 req’d

S106 ref

Decision

CIL agreed

S106 agreed

1

Chessel Pencil Bollards

BS3 Community Development

£1,645/

£1,645

£1,974

£1,974

 

 

Defer to future meeting of AC5 to be held asap  (lack of quoracy):

The Committee, in the light of the fact that no relevant Public Sector Equalities Duty assessment has been submitted for this specific project, requires the production of an assessment to be provided and agreed by the Chair before any funding can be released for this project

£0

 

2

Project Green Trail  ...  view the full minutes text for item 6