Items
No. |
Item |
1. |
Welcome, Introductions, and Safety Information
Minutes:
The Chair welcomed those present and
introductions were made.
|
2. |
Apologies for absence
Minutes:
Apologies were received from Councillor Makawi
who was substituted by Councillor Mack.
|
3. |
Declarations of interest
Minutes:
There were no declarations of interest.
|
4. |
Minutes from the previous meeting and decisions log PDF 97 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The minutes of the meeting on 31st
March 2023 were approved subject to:
·
The inclusion of Councillor Gary Hopkins in the list
of attendees
·
It was agreed that the discussion around the need to
ensure all Cabinet Member portfolios were incorporated into the
Policy Committees, particularly in relation to cross cutting areas
had not been adequately captured.
Members noted the decision log.
RESOLVED:
That the minutes from the previous meeting be approved, subject to
the amendments above.
|
5. |
Public Forum PDF 103 KB
Up to 30 minutes is allowed for this item.
Any member of the public or Councillor may
participate in Public Forum. The detailed arrangements for so doing
are set out in the Public Information Sheet at the back of this
agenda. Public Forum items should be emailed to committee.system@bristol.gov.uk
and please note that the following deadlines will apply in relation
to this meeting:-
Questions - Written questions must be received
3 clear working days prior to the meeting. For this meeting, this
means that your question(s) must be received in this office at
the latest by 5pm on Monday 24th April 2023.
Petitions and Statements - Petitions and
statements must be received on the working day prior to the
meeting. For this meeting this means that your submission must be
received in this office at the latest by 12 Noon on Thursday
27th April 2023.
Please note, your
time allocated to speak may have to be strictly limited if there
are a lot of submissions. This may be as short as one minute
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The following public forum questions and
statements were received for the meeting.
Questions (and
answers)
No.
|
Name
|
Question
|
PQ 01
|
Dan Ackroyd
|
Q1. Meetings in
Bristol City Council have a recurring problem with senior council
members talking out of turn, to talk over other people, and
currently the people chairing meetings seem to take no action
against this disruption. What changes are going to be made to how
meetings are run to make this less of an issue under the committee
system?
A1. This is a question for the Committee
Members to answer.
|
PQ 02
|
Clive Stevens
|
Q2. Agenda item 4 -
decisions log: In the February sessions you decided to constitute
an Escalations Panel. This was in response to issues about scrutiny
and ensuring decision making is to the best benefit of the public
as a whole. I do not see from the Work Programme that you have
allocated time for further discussion about this valuable new
addition to Bristol City Council’s system of governance.
Could you consider including time for further discussion and
decisions please to refine the workings of the Escalations Panel?
(I would be very happy to furnish some examples of why it is an
important addition to the Committee System).
A2. In July 23, the CMWG will be agreeing the
remainder of their Work Programme for 23/24. Items will include
consideration of any areas, such as the Escalation Panel, where
more details may be required before redrafting or preparing the
relevant parts of the Constitution can commence.
|
PQ 03
|
Clive Stevens
|
Q3. Agenda item 7
– Roles and Responsibilities of Councillors: There
doesn’t appear to be any mention in the current report of
councillors’ requirements to scrutinise the information
provided to them. Given that you have decided to build scrutiny
into the job tasks of each committee, could you consider adding
this job to committee members please?
A3. Members of the CMWG are invited to share
their views on this suggestion.
|
PQ 04
|
Clive Stevens
|
Q4. Agenda item 7 -
Appendix A part 6 - Chair of a Policy Committee – Generic
Chairs’
Responsibilities.
(Para 2, top of page 8 of 11). This paragraph requires the chair of
a policy committee to be impartial. I don’t think this is
possible in many cases and could become grounds for challenge. The
chair needs to be fair and run a meeting in such a way as to
facilitate open discussions etc. Clearly a chair mustn’t be
pre-determined but I don’t think they need to pretend to be
impartial, being fair is sufficient.
Please consider the use of the word impartial in that specific
clause?
A4. The Nolan Principles state that
‘holders of public office must act and take decisions
impartially, fairly and on merit, using the best evidence and
without discrimination or bias.’ Therefore, use of the term
impartial is consistent.
|
PQ 05
|
Clive Stevens
|
Q5. Agenda item 7 -
Appendix A part 6 - Chair of a Policy Committee – Generic
Chairs’
Responsibilities.
(Para 2, top ... view
the full minutes text for item 5.
|
|
6. |
Policy Committees - Structure and Responsibilities PDF 607 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Head of Democratic Engagement provided a
brief introduction to the report and reminded the Committee of what
was discussed at the previous meeting. The Group went onto consider
the report, commenting as follows:
- The responsibilities of each Policy
Committee as set out were broadly acceptable, however, there were
concerns about the need to ensure public health was given
sufficient prominence. In view of this,
it was agreed that there should be an eighth Policy Committee
‘Public Health and Communities’ and the ‘Homes
and Communities’ Policy Committee would be changed to
‘Homes and Housing Delivery.’ It was noted that this would increase the number
of seats each Group was required to fill, however, it was also
noted that not all Policy Committees would need to meet with the
same frequency.
- The Group heard from a Councillor on
the need for the Health and Wellbeing Policy Committee to have a
clear focus on Adult Social Care, as this was where the majority of
the Council’s budget was utilised. The Group was reminded of
the statutory requirement to have a separate Health and Wellbeing
Board, made up of Members and external partners.
- Members discussed the option of
establishing any standing Sub-Committees and agreed that from the
outset there should be one relating to budget matters, which would
report to the Strategy and Resources Policy Committee, with another
covering Health, which would report to the Public Health and
Communities Policy Committee. Any other Sub-Committees would be
agreed in due course.
- Consideration was given to local
decision making with differing views about if and when the current
arrangements should be reviewed and potentially
expanded. Members noted that this would
be subject to in-depth discussion at their meeting on
26th May 23.
- It should be noted that the Local
Plan Working Group would be retained in the new model.
- The Group agreed that a forum should
exist for all Policy Committee Chairs and senior officers to meet
regularly to discuss key strategic matters. These would not be
formal, decision-making meetings but would enable a cohesive
approach.
- Members went on to consider the
arrangements for review of the Council’s monitoring of risk,
performance and budgets and agreed that each Policy Committee
should receive reports in these areas, with oversight being the
responsibility of the Strategy and Resources Policy
Committee.
- It was noted that the Policy
Committees would need to be politically proportionate, and Members
agreed that the Chairs and Vice-Chairs of all Committees (including
the regulatory ones) would be appointed at Full Council.
- The group agreed that the Strategy
and Resources Committee does not have to exclusively be made up of
Policy Committee Chairs, with appointments to be made by the Whips
in due course.
RESOLVED: That the
following recommendations be made to Full Council:
- That there would be standing
Sub-Committees relating to Health and Budgets, reporting to the
Communities and Public Health and Strategy and Resources Committee
respectively.
- That there be 8 Policy Committees as
follows:
-
Adult Social Care
-
Children and Young ...
view the full minutes text for item 6.
|
7. |
Roles and Responsibilities of Councillors under the Committee Model of Governance PDF 212 KB
Minutes:
The Director of Legal and Democratic Services
provided a brief introduction to the report.
It was noted that consideration was needed for
who would agree decisions in the period between the Mayor stepping
down and the Council Leader being elected.
Members suggested the following amendments be
made to the report:
Roles and Functions
of All Councillors
- Item 4: Addition of ‘act as
community champion and encourage community cohesion’ and
change to ‘all Councillors must advise local individuals and
interest groups in their dealings with the Council where
appropriate’
- Item 7: Inclusion of a line to
reflect the requirement for all Councillors to examine and
challenge issues.
- Item 8: Include reference to the
Member Code of Conduct.
- Item 9:
Add the requirement to uphold the Public Sector Equalities
duties.
Leader of the
Council
- Include the role of Chair of the
Strategy and Resources Committee.
Chairs and Vice
Chairs
- All
Chairs and Vice-Chairs will be appointed by Full Council.
RESOLVED: That the
following recommendations be made to Full Council:
- That the Chairs and Vice Chairs of
all Committees in the Committee system would be appointed by Full
Council.
- The Strategy and Resources Committee
will have oversight of the Councils Corporate Finances and will be
Chaired by the Leader of Council.
- The Strategy and Resources Committee
does not have to exclusively be made up of Policy Committee Chairs,
with appointments to be made by the Whips in due course.
- Risk and performance will be
monitored by individual Policy Committees. The Strategy and
Resources Committee will monitor corporate risk and
performance.
|
8. |
Stakeholder engagement feedback - standing item
Minutes:
No updates were provided.
|
9. |
Work Programme - for noting only PDF 61 KB
Minutes:
Members noted the Work Programme.
|