Modern.gov Breadcrumb

Modern.gov Content

Agenda item

Wellbeing

Presenting officer: Andrew McGrath, Neighbourhood Partnership Co-ordinator

 

Presented By:Andrew McGrath

Minutes:

The Partnership received a report of the Neighbourhood Co?ordinator regarding the allocation and recommendations of the Wellbeing Panel.

 

Well Being funds available at the start of the year:            £30,000 

                                               

At the June meeting the NP awarded:                      £1,266

At the September meeting the NP awarded:           £1,630

At the December meeting the NP awarded:             £150  

At the March meeting the NP awarded:                   £4,839.79

                                                           

Total allocated in 2015/16 =                                     £7,885.79

 

This left (unspent in 2015/16):                                  £22,114.21  (c/f to 2016/17)

 

In respect of recommendation (3) St Ursula’s PTFA playground project a question was raised about how provision of playgrounds in academies was funded. It was considered that further information be sought before making a decision.

 

In respect of recommendation (4) Councillor Radford declared a non-pecuniary interest regarding her work in relation to the Westbury Park Youth Group and  informed the Partnership that she would not take part in the consideration and vote for this item.

 

The Neighbourhood Committee Members present voted on the recommendations as set out in the report.

 

On being put to the vote, subject to Councillor Radford abstaining with regard to recommendation (4), it was unanimously –

 

Resolved -       to note the current Well Being allocation and approve funding allocation as recommended by the Wellbeing Panel (as amended regarding recommendation 3), as set out below -

 

Name

How much

Requested £

Discussion and Recommendation

(1) Golden Hill Sports

£1,118.69

The panel was pleased that the applicant has sought and gained match-funding. 

Vote:  Unanimous in favour of funding

 

Recommendation:  Fund Fully

 

(2) Sea Mills Together

£250

This has to be considered a one-off grant.  The NP is supportive of Sea Mills residents wanting to retain their idea of being a village, but the NP is also keen to fully integrate Sea Mills in to the Stoke Bishop ward. 

 

Vote:  Unanimous in favour of funding

 

Recommendation:  Fund fully

 

(3) St Ursula’s PTFA playground project

£3,000

 

(£3,913.64)

The panel has supported schools before but is concerned that the plans for the new build do not include playground provision. 

 

The panel would like a plaque acknowledging the NP’s contribution placed either on the new bench or nearby.

Vote:  Unanimous in favour of funding

Recommendation:  Fund fully

DEFERRED – pending further information regarding Academy funding for playground provision

(4) The Church in Westbury Park

£992.55

The panel is not inclined to fund the compost element of the application as this is something that can be sought cheaply and regularly elsewhere

 

The panel would like a plaque acknowledging the NP’s contribution placed either on the new bench or nearby. 

 

Vote:  in favour of funding £792.55

 

Recommendation:  Fund £792.55

(5) W-o-T Village Hall

£3,000

The panel would like a plaque acknowledging the NP’s contribution placed either on the new bench or nearby.

 

Vote:  Unanimous in favour of funding

 

Recommendation:  Fund fully

 

(6) W-o-T Methodist Church

£2,155

The application was difficult to understand but it is assumed that the figure here is what is being requested.

 

The application appears to contain a prayer.  The applicant should be reminded that BCC funds cannot be used to fund religious work. This application comes close to be being overtly religious. As the application is to help upgrade facilities for the benefit of user groups, the request is granted.

 

Vote:  Unanimous in favour of funding

 

Recommendation:  Fund fully

 

(7) Working Group for Older People

£3,000

This application was withdrawn.  The Well Being Panel believes that the WGOP, as a working group of the NP, shouldn’t have to apply for funds from the Well Being budget.  It has recommended that the Chair of the WGOP put in a formal request to the NP for £3,000 from the NP budget. 

 

Recommendation:  Do not fund as application withdrawn

 

Supporting documents: